Timberborn offers players the chance to build and manage beaver civilizations, and currently, there are two distinct factions to choose from: the nature-harmonizing Folktales and the efficiency-driven Iron Teeth. Each faction presents a unique playstyle, different structures, and distinct population management strategies. With Timberborn still in early access, we may see more factions added in the future, but for now, let’s dive deep into what sets these two apart and which one might be the right fit for your gameplay.
Faction Identities and Population Management
Folktales embody a more traditional, nature-friendly approach to survival. Their societies grow naturally, with beavers forming family units and having children as long as there is enough housing space. This leads to a more stable and predictable population that generally aligns with available resources and housing capacity. While this passive growth makes for a more hands-off approach to population control, it does mean that expansion takes a more organic, slower pace.
Iron Teeth, on the other hand, abandon natural reproduction entirely, opting for a controlled breeding system using breeding pods. These pods require water and berries to function, allowing players to regulate population growth more precisely. By pausing or activating individual breeding pods, you can manage labor supply efficiently. However, this also means every district must maintain a steady supply of berries, making expansion more resource-intensive. Over time, breeding pods can sustain large populations, but initial growth is slower compared to the Folktales’ natural method.
Unique Faction Structures and Playstyle Differences
Both factions come with their own set of specialized buildings that cater to their unique strengths and weaknesses.
Infrastructure and Storage
- Iron Teeth have a powerful tool in the Large Metal Platform, which allows them to build over fields, rivers, and industrial areas with ease. It is costly but provides unmatched flexibility in city design.
- Folktales counter with the Underground Warehouse, a massive storage facility that holds 4,000 units of resources in a compact space. Despite lacking a stackable solid tag, its sheer capacity makes it one of the most efficient storage solutions in the game.
Housing
- Folktales prefer spacious, naturalistic lodges that are designed with comfort in mind. While they offer vertical stacking, they require careful planning due to multiple entrance points on upper floors. Players often have to dynamite terrain or create elaborate stairway systems to optimize housing layouts.
- Iron Teeth focus on efficiency with their Barracks and Rowhouses, which offer incredible space optimization. The Large Rowhouse is especially potent, being four stories tall and housing up to eight beavers in just a 1×2 footprint, making it the most efficient housing option in the game. This compact design makes it easy to stack and integrate with scaffolding, forming beaver skyscrapers.
Water and Agriculture
- Folktales gain access to the Irrigation Tower, which provides hydration to a large radius, keeping crops alive during droughts. However, a simple dynamited hole filled with water can replicate this effect for Iron Teeth players, making the irrigation tower somewhat redundant in the grand scheme.
- Folktales also benefit from Beehives, which boost crop growth by 25%, allowing for more efficient farmland usage. This is a game-changer, as fertile land is limited and districts have strict area constraints.
- Iron Teeth, in contrast, rely on industrial power and do not have beehives or an equivalent agricultural bonus.
Power Generation
- Folktales use Windmills, which can produce up to 300 horsepower but fluctuate with wind conditions. While renewable, their inconsistency can be problematic for high-energy industries.
- Iron Teeth use Engines, which run on logs and produce 200 horsepower constantly. While reliable, they require a steady wood supply, meaning more deforestation or advanced forestry planning.
Which Faction is Stronger?
Both factions are well-balanced and viable, catering to different playstyles.
- Choose Folktales if:
- You prefer a more natural, passive approach to population management.
- You want stronger food efficiency via beehives.
- You like mass storage solutions with the underground warehouse.
- You enjoy designing aesthetic, nature-friendly towns with sprawling, lodge-based housing.
- Choose Iron Teeth if:
- You want total control over population growth via breeding pods.
- You prefer compact, stackable housing that can be built into efficient high-rises.
- You need consistent power generation with log-burning engines.
- You favor an industrial, efficiency-first approach to city building.
Final Thoughts
Ultimately, the choice between Folktales and Iron Teeth comes down to playstyle preference. If you want an easier early game with natural population growth and food efficiency, Folktales are a great pick. If you prefer meticulous control, high-density city layouts, and a more industrialized approach, Iron Teeth provide the tools to make that happen.
For expansion into multiple districts, Folktales tend to have an easier time due to their self-sustaining population and storage advantages. However, Iron Teeth excel in vertical space optimization and efficient, highly-controlled population planning.
Both factions have their strengths and weaknesses, and Timberborn does a great job making each feel unique while maintaining balance. As the game continues to develop, new factions may emerge with fresh mechanics, but for now, these two provide plenty of depth for strategic players.




Leave a comment